Last year the CIA
took a look through its crystal ball and made a series of
predictions in a report, "Global Trends 2015," about what the world
would be like in 15 years. The CIA examined demographic trends,
economic trends and technological trends and their effect on
governments, international stability and people's lives.
The CIA also
examined the phenomenon of terrorism and concluded: "States with
poor governance; ethnic, cultural or religious tensions; weak
economies; and porous borders will be prime breeding grounds for
terrorism. ... Between now and 2015 terrorist tactics will become
increasingly sophisticated and designed to achieve mass
casualties."
The CIA got it
right, but left something out: the status of women. My grandmother,
Margaret Sanger, said more than a half century ago that the issues
of world population, world peace and the status of women were
inextricably interwoven and that world stability could not be
achieved without improving the status of the world's
women.
I believe that we
who support reproductive rights and improving the status of women
are indispensable in coming up with a solution to whatever caused
the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11.
Although the
cause of reproductive rights isn't directed toward alleviating
ancient ethnic or religious hatreds, nor toward alleviating the
inequities caused by globalization, nor toward dealing with the
clash of civilizations, all of which in one form or another have
been cited as the underlying causes of the Sept. 11 attacks, our
mission deals with all of these.
What we demand is
respect for the fundamental humanity of every person, especially
women, and for their right to decide whether and when to have
children. And we believe that these principles, if followed, can
help to foster respect for everyone's involvement in civic life, in
the economy, and in the government. When we eliminate exclusion and
disenfranchisement in a country, we can go a long way toward
building communities based on common values and building nations
governed by the consent of all the people.
On the other
hand, if we don't respect women and girls in society and under the
law, the danger is the primacy of anti-social men in positions of
power. And if we don't provide options for family planning to both
women and men, the danger is unsustainable population growth that
leads to unemployment, poverty and, ultimately,
desperation.
This has taken on
a new urgency since Sept. 11. The New York Times quoted one Middle
East expert last week: "Angry young men, many of them unemployed,
have seized the public arena from Algeria to South Asia and filled
it with hate, intolerance and the abuse of women." How does this
happen?
In some Middle
Eastern societies, men and women are frequently segregated, women
are veiled and schooled separately (if at all) and chaperoned.
Polygamy is common, and often it is only the wealthy, high-status
males who get multiple wives. (Bin Laden is reported to have four.)
Daughters are often sold to their future husband's family, yet poor
or unemployed males cannot afford the dowry.
Furthermore,
there are more men than women in many Middle Eastern countries. This
is the opposite of the norm in developed countries where there are
more women than men. Most countries begin with a sex ratio at birth
of about 105; that is, there are 5% more boys born than girls. But
women soon become the majority sex in most countries because males
tend to engage in higher-risk activities and thus die earlier.
But not in the
Middle East. It appears that girls die before boys in the Middle
East because better nutrition and health care are allocated to boys
to ensure their survival. The United Nations estimates that the sex
ratio worldwide is 102 men per 100 women. The ratio peaks at 115 men
per 100 women in Saudi Arabia, but it is also above-average in Libya
(108), Afghanistan (107), Pakistan (106) and Iran (105).
Exacerbating this
inequality are the extremely high birth rates that put pressure on
the economy. Whereas the total fertility rate, or average number of
children per woman, worldwide is 2.8, it is almost or more than
double that figure in Iraq (5.2), Pakistan (5.4), Saudi Arabia (6.1)
and Afghanistan (6.9). With unsustainable birth rates, the economies
of these countries also have high unemployment rates. The Wall
Street Journal last week estimated that the unemployment rate in
Saudi Arabia was 14% and the per capita income had fallen from
$28,000 in the 1980s to $8,000 last year.
I believe that
these realities--of high birth rates, sex imbalances, unemployment,
poverty, and a culture that devalues women and also men--that exist
throughout much of the Middle East are a significant factor in
encouraging young men to become disaffected with their lives and
leading many of them to desperate measures.
My grandmother
was more prescient than she knew when she said that the issues of
world population, the status of women and world peace are
interwoven. Fortunately, most governments worldwide, including those
in many Middle Eastern countries, agree with this worldview, as they
indicated by signing the Program of Action put forth at the
International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo in
1994. These nations all agreed that every country has to address the
status of its women, provide sustainable development, ensure
childbearing by choice, provide health care and education to all,
and involve all men and women in the processes put in place to make
this happen.
Alex
Sanger
12/20/01